Further to my last post...

As I said earlier, the results of this week's poll show that male chastity does have a tendency to result in less penetrative sex for the male. I was going to conclude from that that it just shows that (overall) penetrative sex is far less important for the female than the male, but that wouldn't be very scientific, would it? After all, how do I know that all those voters who said that there has been a decrease in penetrative sex aren't using dildos or even strap-ons on their wives as a substitute? Or watching their wives using them on themselves... or not being allowed to watch, maybe? Not to mention the 'chastity-cuckolds' whose wives are getting plenty of cock thank you very much, just not theirs!

What is evident is that no one has voted for the 'no difference' option as yet, so opting for male chastity looks fairly sure to make some kind of difference, and more likely that'll mean less 'P.I.V.' sex, unless you're one of the lucky ones of course...